Cornell Language and Technology

exploring how technologies affect the way we talk, think and understand each other

Monday, February 13, 2006

#2 Adjacency Pairs and Track 1/2

Adjacency pairs consist of a pair of signals in conversation – one participant does (typically says) something, and the other responds. The type and content of the second part are dependent upon the first and involve the uptake of a joint project proposed in the first part. For example, an acknowledgement would follow thankfulness, and a greeting from person B would follow a greeting from person A.

A conversation between two people includes two synchronous communication tracks. Track 1 contains the main purpose of the conversation – the official topics that both parties have decided to talk about. The function of Track 2 is to enable both parties to have a successful communication. This track becomes conspicuous, for example, when person B wants to make sure he correctly heard and understood something that person A uttered. In this track, people refer to the communication itself rather than its “official business.”

Instant Message Conversation

[1. Greeting] A: yo

[2. Greeting] B: hi

[1. Question] A: how do u take pics of a wmp

[2. Answer / 1. Question] B: huh {Track 2}

[2. Answer] A: wmp

[1. Question] A: how do u take a snapshot

A: of a movie file {End of Track 2}

[2. Answer / 1. Request] B: try pressing ctrl-i

[2. Acknowledgement / 1. Question] A: control and I {Track 2}

[2. Answer] B: yeah {End of Track 2}

[1. Question] A: do u pause it

A: or do it while its playin

[2. Answer] B: it doesnt matter

Text Message Conversation (with my mom, after she realized she could send texts)

[1. Assertion] Her: i did not no i cd tx msg

[2. Assent] Me: Wow i thought we tried it and you werent signed up for it

[1. Assertion] Her: i am slo

[2. Acknowledgement / 1. Suggestion] Me: if you learn how to use t9word its a lot faster and easier

[2. Acknowledgement / 1. Question] Her: how

[2. Answer / 1. Promise] Me: its hard to explain now.. ill tell you later, or maybe you can ask someone

[[no response to promise] 1. Assertion] Her: Dad bdy

[2. Assent / 1. Question] Me: I know, is he working late

[2. Answer] Her: yes

1 Comments:

At 1:03 AM, Blogger H said...

I think your text message conversation with your mom is quite interesting. I had a little trouble understanding it at first, and had to pause for quite a bit before I understood that "i did not no i cd tx msg" is the same as "i did not know i could text message". I guess when conversations are taken out of the medium in which they were produced, misunderstanding can occur. In the medium of text messaging, it is expected of everyone to abbreviate their sentences--responses to questions are often one word answers that captures the essence of the question. And in the online medium, people would write as if they were writing an essay, whether it's for a blog, an email, or somethign else. Therefore, it would be unnatural to abbreviate everything.

There are utterances that are unique to different mediums. Abbreviations are common in text messages. Also, in cell phone conversations, "Where are you?" is a very frequent utterance that is not seen in many other mediums. That is, one wouldn't say "where are you?" in face to face conversations, or even on landline phone conversations, or IMs (though sometimes, when the person's usual font and color changes, it might be that they're not at their usual place of IMing).

 

Post a Comment

<< Home